4 thoughts on “Lifetime Value Part 3: Monetization’s role in LTV and how to impact it”

  1. I think you are missing several key points.. If gamers were able to trade a virtual item after purchase, thus feeling more comfortable making their first purchase, don’t you think a greater percentage of gamers would spend real money? Moreover, if a gamer could convert one games currency into another, thus increasing the utility of that virtual currency, do you not think more gamers would spend real money knowing they could swap into another game?


    1. In my experience, efforts to expand the pool of paying players has not generated nearly the returns as better monetizing players who are already playing. Most visualization of monetization activity has a heavy tail distribution and I think that is the underlying nature of Free-2-Play games, trying to move it into a normal distribution is like acting against the law of physics. Regarding moving currency between games, I was a big advocate two or three years ago but again every effort to do it has failed. The most glaring is Facebook credits. The promise there was people would monetize better because they could use them in any game that took FB credits. The reality was all the games that I saw that had a deep integration of Facebook credits (where Facebook credits replaced the premium currency) saw at least a 25 percent drop-off in ARPDAU and most were over 30%.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: