Bayes’ Theorem Part 2: How to use Bayes’ Rule when you have multiple prior data points

Last week I started my series of posts about Bayes’ Rule and why it was the foundation of good business decision making . In the next few weeks I will hit on some fun applications but today wanted to build further the foundation for using effectively Bayes’ Rule by discussing continuous parameter values (or multiple existing data points). Again, I borrow heavily from easily the best work on Bayes’ Rule, James Stone’s book Bayes Rule: A Tutorial Introduction to Bayesian Analsysis. This application will be particularly relevant when using Bayes’ Theorem to make the best decisions in your green light process, corporate development, investing or anywhere there are multiple historical results to examine.

Multiple data points are referred to as “continuous variables.” The values of a continuous variable are like densely packed points on a line, where each point corresponds to the value of a real number. The main advantage of working with continuous values is that we can usually describe a probability distribution with an equation, and because an equation is defined in terms of a few key parameters, it is said to provide a parametric description of a probability distribution.

To make the above relevant to you, think of yourself as a VC. You are looking at a potential investment. You start by looking at how similar investments over the last two years performed; this return on investment represents the points on the line. The parameters could be the space the business occupied, management team and level of investment. Rather than potential investments, to keep the analysis simple I will use a coin flip as an example. Continue reading “Bayes’ Theorem Part 2: How to use Bayes’ Rule when you have multiple prior data points”

Analytics 3.0

As many know, I believe end-of-year predictions have zero value and I prefer to look at important trends that are already unfolding and will impact readers next year. The most important trend right now for people in the social media and gaming spaces, as well as almost anyone in the tech space, is the evolution of analytics. Thomas Davenport, author of the seminal work Competing on Analytics, recently wrote an article in the Harvard Business Review about Analytics 3.0. Just as Analytics 2.0 transformed the gaming space, allowing companies like Zynga, Playfish and Disney to leap over established competitors, Analytics 3.0 can reshape as dramatically the gaming ecosystem. Analytics 3.0 is a new resolve to apply powerful data gathering and analysis methods not just to a company’s operations but also to its offerings—to embed data smartness into the products, services and games that customers buy.


A brief history of analytics

To understand best the impact of Analytics 3.0, it is helpful to understand 1.0 and 2.0 and their impact. Analytics 1.0 ushered in an objective, deep understanding of important business phenomena and gave managers and leaders the fact-based comprehension to go beyond intuition when making decisions. Data about sales, customer interactions, production processes, etc., were recorded, aggregated and analyzed. For the first time, analytics were used to compete by creating greater efficiency: making better decisions on key issues to improve performance. Continue reading “Analytics 3.0”

%d bloggers like this: