How startups should use metrics

I recently came across a fantastic presentation on startup metrics by Andreas Klinger. It is embedded below but given its length I wanted to highlight the key takeaways:

  • The biggest risk for a startup is not failing to create a good product with a market; it is having a competitor come up with something a little better. Great example is Lyft, which I am sure is a little envious of Uber.
  • There are four stages for a startup to succeed. The first is discovery, generating the product idea. The second is validation, making sure the market wants the product. The third is efficiency, being able to supply the product cost effectively in quantity. Then there is scale, delivering the product to millions.
  • To look at it from the user perspective, there are two key elements: finding the product the market needs and then optimizing (the former encompassing discovery and validation, the latter representing efficiency and scale). To find a product the user needs, you need to understand these needs and create something that will be sticky (i.e., that they will return to) and viral (they will talk about). To optimize, you then need to build out the right revenue model and level, and then scale.
  • According to Klinger, 83 percent of startups are in the discovery phase (empathy, stickiness and virality) while most analytics are around revenue and scale.

    Andreas Klinger
  • A/B tests, funnels, referral optimization, etc., are about optimization, not innovation and cannot replace creating a great product that people want.
  • There is a way to get product insights from data to create that innovative product and you can do it with a much smaller number of users. They key is looking at whether people stay on your site or in your app, in other words, whether they are hooked.
  • Focusing on improving metrics creates a false positive, you can always improve ad conversions or funnels but what looks good for investors does not necessarily improve the product. You may be converting or funneling the wrong users.

Continue reading “How startups should use metrics”

Analytics 3.0

As many know, I believe end-of-year predictions have zero value and I prefer to look at important trends that are already unfolding and will impact readers next year. The most important trend right now for people in the social media and gaming spaces, as well as almost anyone in the tech space, is the evolution of analytics. Thomas Davenport, author of the seminal work Competing on Analytics, recently wrote an article in the Harvard Business Review about Analytics 3.0. Just as Analytics 2.0 transformed the gaming space, allowing companies like Zynga, Playfish and Disney to leap over established competitors, Analytics 3.0 can reshape as dramatically the gaming ecosystem. Analytics 3.0 is a new resolve to apply powerful data gathering and analysis methods not just to a company’s operations but also to its offerings—to embed data smartness into the products, services and games that customers buy.

Slide1

A brief history of analytics

To understand best the impact of Analytics 3.0, it is helpful to understand 1.0 and 2.0 and their impact. Analytics 1.0 ushered in an objective, deep understanding of important business phenomena and gave managers and leaders the fact-based comprehension to go beyond intuition when making decisions. Data about sales, customer interactions, production processes, etc., were recorded, aggregated and analyzed. For the first time, analytics were used to compete by creating greater efficiency: making better decisions on key issues to improve performance. Continue reading “Analytics 3.0”

How to hire for analytic positions

Given the importance of analytics to social and mobile game companies (just see all my posts about LTV, performance marketing, virality, monetization, etc.), having the best business intelligence (BI) team is of central importance. Finding that talent, however, is not easy. I have been very lucky to work with some of the best BI talent throughout my career; they have made me look much smarter than I am. Not everyone will be as lucky as I have been. A recent article in the MIT Sloan Management Review provides great advice on predicting the performance of potential analysts.

Data Ninja

The article points out that the ideal analyst does not exist; the job description is looking for a “unicorn.” You should not be hiring for a laundry list of skills (e.g., “I need someone with R, SWRVE and Mixpanel expertise”) because the game industry is evolving so quickly most of those skills will soon be outdated. Instead, you should look for the curiosity to keep learning, rather than the skills themselves. Continue reading “How to hire for analytic positions”